Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Protect land use of those not directly affected by the mine

I am a fisherman of Bristol Bay. I was raised on bay every summer since 1970. My family has benefited from salmon both commercially and by subsistence use for years.


After the fishing season was over, my family has fished and camped up the Wood-Tikchik lake system and have always enjoyed hunting and putting up fish.


I am amazed by those in other river and lake systems that would choose to not oppose even the possibility of that lifestyle be damaged in any way. Furthermore that there are others that openly support the Pebble Mine knowing that there is a chance that their subsistence way of life could end.


I propose that legislation and regulations be drafted now to designate the protection of land use of those that won’t be directly affected by any damage the mine could impose if there were a spill.


If those that choose not to oppose or openly support the mine want to risk their renewable resource for a non-renewable one, then I want safeguards in place to make sure my rights are protected.


Worse case scenario is that the mine spills toxic waste into the river system an ALL the salmon in the Nushagak River system and the Iliamna Lake system die. That would affect fishing both commercially and subsistence to the point where fish are no longer available for use.


That would impact all the people in those villages in their ability to put salmon and trout in their freezers. It would also impact about 1000 commercial fishing permit holders. Both groups will want fish.


Northern Dynasty has promised a no-net-loss promise as far as salmon goes. Where will those fish come from?


Those that choose to gamble with access to the resource for subsistence use will have to look somewhere for salmon. I want to ensure that the Wood-Tikchik Lakes are protected from the increased need for salmon from over fishing for subsistence use.


Driftnetters from the affected bays that are trying to make a living will need to fish some place. If the only returns are from the Wood River, then the 400 – 600 boats that fish the Nushagak Bay could blow up to 1800 boats.


Let’s think ahead and ensure that those that choose to gamble with their resource aren’t able to destroy resources from another area by over fishing.


Togiak District has successfully devised a management plan to ensure that their salmon returns are protected. I don’t believe it is too soon to at least draft a management plan to protect use rights. It is responsible and will protect sustainability of salmon use both subsistence and commercially.


That being said, the mine is not built. The permits are not submitted and approved. There is time to oppose the mine and choose a renewable resource over a non-renewable one.

7 comments:

fritz said...

Your points are well taken Gary. One I would add, from a commercial fishing perspective, is that even without the catastrophic ecological disater that the Pebble mine poses, it's mere existence will destroy the unique reputation that Bristol Bay wild salmon now enjoy. Nowhere else on the planet do wild, genetically diverse salmon stocks exist in abundance even approaching that of Bristol Bay's. Psychological tainting of the salmon market depressed salmon prices here the year of the Exxon Valdez spill even though none of that crude oil came close to our shores -- and that was before salmon farming pulled the rug out from under the market for wild fish. Efforts to rebuild this industry based on the fact that this wild fishery is truly unique in the world will not be helped by the presence of the continent's largest strip mine at the headwaters of our spawning areas and fishing grounds.

brokeblogging said...

How are the villages going to survive? In Dillingham you have the BB Agencies contributing to the community, there's not enough jobs in the villages to keep going.
what efforts to rebuild this industry are really going on over there in Dillingham? BBEDC has a nice building going up, then what? What kind of programs do the 'leaders' have planned to sustain? Gas is over $5 a gallon in the villages, people are broke and can't afford fuel to get moose.

miner said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
miner said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dave said...

Gee, Everyone wants to kill the fish, yet Pebble will do the least dammage. I think you only want to be able to bicker about something. Just worry about you and the world will be a better place.
I am sick of the "what if's". Well what if, what if. Just grow up and spend more time working and less time being upset.

miner said...

From my own personal experience:
www.ftknox.info
Don't let another canadian company do this again....... Thanks, John Scott

miner said...

Oh yea!! I forgot to put this link to prove another point---> http://www.miningwatch.ca/index.php?/Kinross
We need the fish but don't forget the people...
http://ftknox.info/